|
RubiStar |
Rubric Made Using:
RubiStar ( http://rubistar.4teachers.org )
>> To save this document onto your
computer, please choose File :: Save As from your Browser
Menu. |
|
|
CATEGORY |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
Score |
|
Attractiveness/Craftmanship |
The mask shows that the creator was took great pride
in his/her work. The design and construction look carefully planned. The
item is neat (free of unwanted bumps, drips, marks, and tears). |
The mask shows that the creator took pride in his/her
work. The design and construction look planned. The item has a few flaws
(unwanted bumps, drips, marks, tears), but these do not detract from the
overall look. |
The design and construction were planned. The item has
several flaws (unwanted bumps, drips, marks, tears), that detract from the
overall look. |
The mask looks thrown together at the last minute. It
appears that little design or planning was done. Craftmanship is poor.
|
|
|
Details |
Mask details are all easily viewed and identifiable
from across the classroom. |
Most mask details are easily viewed and identifiable
from across the classroom. |
Most mask details are easily identified when the mask
is seen close-up. |
Many mask details are too small or are not clear.
|
|
|
Durability |
The mask was built to last through multiple wearings
or performances. |
Most of the mask is sturdy, but there are a couple of
pieces that might need extra care when wearing it. |
The basic structure of the mask is sturdy, but many of
the details are fragile. It looks like it would not look good after
wearing it once or twice. |
The mask is flimsy and falls apart easily. It may not
last for one wearing. |
|
|
Creativity |
Totally original design, no element is an exact copy
of designs seen in source material. |
Most of the mask elements are unique, but 1 element
may be copied from source material. |
Some aspects of the mask are unique, but several
elements are copied from source materials or other students. |
The mask is a copy of a mask seen in source material
or one made by another student (80% or more of elements are copied).
|
|
|
Time and Effort |
Class time was used wisely. Much time and effort went
into the planning and design of the mask. It is clear the student worked
at home as well as at school. |
Class time was used wisely. Student could have put in
more time and effort at home. |
Class time was not always used wisely, but student did
do some additional work at home. |
Class time was not used wisely and the student put in
no additional effort. |
|
|
Knowledge about Culture/Story |
The student can answer 3 questions correctly about how
the mask relates to the culture or story being studied. |
The student can answer 2 questions correctly about how
the mask relates to the culture or story being studied. |
The student can answer 1 question correctly about how
the mask relates to the culture or story being studied. |
The student does not understand how the mask relates
to the culture or story being studied. |
|
|
Knowledge of Mask Construction |
The student can clearly describe the steps used to
make his/her mask. The student can accurately point out how this process
was similar or different from mask-making in the culture being studied.
|
The student can clearly describe the steps used to
make his/her mask. |
The student can describe most of the steps used to
make his/her mask. |
The student has great difficulty describing how
his/her mask was constructed. |
|
|
Sources |
The student has 5 or more sources of inspiration
correctly cited. |
The student has 3-4 sources of inspiration correctly
cited. |
The student has 2 sources of inspiration correctly
cited. |
The student has fewer than 2 sources of inspiration
correctly cited. |
|
| © 2001, 2002, 2003 High Plains Regional Technology in Education Consortium HPR*TEC |